Ola Bini is a computer expert and human rights defender recognized worldwide, who is facing a political-judicial process in Ecuador since April 2019. In regard to this, the Ecuadorian and international civil society organizations signing below have decided to set up a mission to observe the preparatory hearing and trial evaluation of December 3rd, 2020.
This decision is based on a shared concern: the possible lack of guarantees to ensure a fair trial for Bini, as established by the constitutional State of rights and justice. From the beginning it has been shown that this case is crossed by political interests and for the constant undue interference of the national government (1). Indeed, top authorities of the Executive Branch, such as President Lenín Moreno and the ex-Minister of Government, María Paula Romo, have carried out public interventions in order to pressure the judicial function (2). This action has aroused multiple rejections and the constant questioning of more than 100 national and international organizations and institutions (3).
On the other hand, observing this hearing is essential since this process constitutes a paradigmatic case for Ecuador and the region. A judicial decision based on undue political pressures, and not in technical criteria, will have negative consequences for the protection of human rights defenders in general and for the validity of digital rights in particular (4). Internet access is increasingly relevant in all social processes, therefore, to persecute and criminalize activists whose technical knowledge is key to protecting human rights in the digital field, implies a severe increase in the risk of its massive violation (5).
We organize this observation mission in order to monitor that the right to a fair trial imparted by an independent and impartial judicial authority is respected and for the decisions taken to meet technical and expert criteria, taking into account the need to ensure the full validity of the human rights inside and outside the digital environment. environment (6).
organizations signing
- Access Now
- Artículo 19
- Asociación de Software Libre del Ecuador (ASLE)
- Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones (APC)
- Brasil de Fato
- Centro de Documentación en Derechos Humanos “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J.” (CSMM)
- Comité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos (CDH)
- Derechos Digitales
- Ecuador Today
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
- Fundación Karisma
- Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos (INREDH)
- Indymedia Ecuador
- Intervozes
- LaLibre
- Marcha Noticias
- Observatorio de Derechos y Justicia (ODJ)
- TEDIC
(1) Amnesty International (AI) has made public its concern regarding such interference: https://www.amnesty.org/es/lat-est/news/2019/08/ecuador-gobierno-inter ere-en-proceso-penalcontra-ola-bini/
(2) The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has requested that all political actors refrain from doing public trials: https://ww-w.eff.org/es/deeplinks/2019/08/ecuador-political-actors-must-step-away-ola-biniscase. Likewise, the Observatory of Rights and Justice (ODJ) has drawn attention to these statements and their negative effects on judicial independence in this case: https://drive.google.com/ le/d/18LfOSp1XWefCzY7cPuJ7UwnYh56sP9MG/view.
(3) Both the United Nations Organization (UN) and the Organization of American States (OAS) have called the attention on the detention of Bini (https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2019/04/15/no-ta/7287350/relatorias-onuoea-cuestionan-stopwave-bini). In addition, the United Nations sent a letter to the Ecuadorian govern-ment: https://freeolabini.org/es/LetterUN/. For more information, review the following support public reactions: https://freeolabi-ni.org/es/statement/; https://freeolabini.org/es/statement-defensoresDDDD/.
(4) The first antecedent about the lack of technical rigor for decision-making happened in the context of the reformulation of charges against Bini. International organizations expert in the fi eld called attention to this particular: https://freeolabini.org/es/rec-ommended_readings/report/ and https://www.eff.org/es/deeplinks/2019/08/telnet-not-crime-un-convincing-prosecution-screenshotleaked-ola-binicase.
(5) On this issue have also been expressed, among others, the Free Software Association of Ecuador (ASLE), the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), the Documentation Center in Human Rights “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J.” (CSMM), the Standing Committee for Rights Humans (CDH), the Regional Foundation for Human Rights Advisory (INREDH) and Indymedia Ecuador. Review: https://www.facebook.com/inredh.derechoshumanos/videos/336202877136352/.
(6) The Regional Foundation for Human Rights Advisory (INREDH) is the delegated organization of this mission to attend the hearing as an observer.
Relacionados
Hacia un 2025 con justicia en la red: por una ley que prevenga, atienda y repare la violencia de género digital en Colombia
En mayo de este año advertimos varias veces sobre los riesgos para los derechos de las víctimas de violencia de género digital y para la libertad de expresión de una iniciativa que buscaba legislar sobre el tema.Legislando sobre violencia de género digital
En mayo de este año advertimos varias veces sobre los riesgos para los derechos de las víctimas de violencia de género digital y para la libertad de expresión de una iniciativa que buscaba legislar sobre el tema. En esa ocasión, nos unimos a varias organizaciones para exigir que se archivara el proyecto de ley y...